|
Asked by
turcotra
29 months ago
|
|
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Show all details, Hide all details
View this question's discussion
(9 comments)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latest post on this question's discussion board:
Well written thoughtful answer. Richard was vilified with no excuse other than to make the Tudor coupe of the crown more acceptable and better received. It is well known that Richard did not like Edward's in laws,and thought they were too common to have many of the posts they were appointed to, but he was loyal to Edward and worshiped him. I have always had trouble with him being a murderer of the only living remains of his older brother, no matter the purpose behind it. Henry Tudor, however gained greatly by having them removed, he inflamed Elizabeth Woodville who then contracted her daughter Elizabeth to him in marriage giving him a more legitimate claim through Edward to the throne. Also, no male heirs of Edwards equaled no challenge to an empty throne.
Read more & discuss
(9 comments)







