"After YEARS of trying to "talk to Iran" about their nukes, is more of the same a "foolish delusion"?"

Topics: iran, politics, nuclear weapons, wishful thinking, diplomacy

Asked by BizzyDitch 21 months ago

Details:

Since the UN and European countries have been trying for years to get Iran to stop their nuclear weapons program, is it true that more of the same is an exercise in futility? Maybe they just didn't use the right words with Ahmadinejad, Iran's crazy president? Is the childish hope that the right type of coaxing will get Iran to concede that they were wrong all along? And is this naive silliness just the "foolish delusion" Bush said to the Israeli Knesset today?

Forward to friends

Discuss this question (22 comments) why can't I answer?

Report abuse

(3)

(22)

Show all details, Hide all details

"Foolish Delusion/Wanton Ignorance"

by Pales on May 15 2008 (21 months ago)

Best Answer
Official Rating

- Collapse

I will place the "right kind of coaxing' comment right alongside this comment by him (President Bush) right after 9-11. "... Islam is a religion of peace & tolerance".

"Islam was spread by fire & sword ... ".

"Peace comes at the point of a sword ...".

The above 2 comments are much more in keeping with Islamic foreign relations since Mo sent out the Islamic armies in AD 632 to slay the infidel & conquer the world for Islam.

The Koran prohibits peace with the infidel.

There will be no peace in the world until Islam is dominant.

The Koran does allow for long-term truces. But only when the forces of Islam are about to have their arse's kicked, so they are not defeated.

The Koran prohibits truces with the infidel if they are winning the battles.

What happens to Israel will in due time happen to all infidels.

Like this Answer?

Send compliment Send message Forward to friends Report abuse Discuss this answer

"Maybe no European nation has the right to tell Iran they can not have nuclear arms. Certainly the US does not have"

by Schelli on May 15 2008 (21 months ago)

Official Rating

- Collapse

the right to do so.

If those countries, including the US, are worried about nuclear arms, perhaps they should give up theirs as a sign of maturity and good faith. After all, if Iran doesn’t need them, neither does the US or anyone in Europe.

I do think Iran deserves to have a way to protect itself from US agression as the oil wars continue.

Like this Answer?

Send compliment Send message Forward to friends Report abuse Discuss this answer

"There's a very easy solution to all this..."

by kymlor on May 15 2008 (21 months ago)

Official Rating

- Collapse

If the U.S would promise to build several dozen nuclear power plants in Iran.. Supply the fuel--FREE..Provide for oversight--for free....

YOU WILL NOT STOP the construction of Nuclear Power Plants in Iran or elsewhere in the middle east.. Cheap, reliable power is key...

As I said before, but apparently nobody on Askville was listening.. Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait is allready negotiating with French/ Russian contractors to build their Nuclear Power Plants in the near future... Probobly even ----ISRAEL.......

As they say, what's good for the goose.....

Sources: Wake up and read the news...Everywhere but here..

Like this Answer?

Send compliment Send message Forward to friends Report abuse Discuss this answer

View this question's discussion (22 comments)

Find similar questions: YEARS talk Iran nukes foolish delusion

You may want to know:

	"What are the G-8 nations supporting Obama on the Iran nukes issue?" (2 answers)

	"What's your delusion?" (4 answers)
	Christian Nevell Bovee said, "No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities."

	"Would Iran be able to hit Israel's nukes before their own are taken out?" (2 answers)

	"If there are no easy options for dealing with Iran nukes, what options are available?" (2 answers)

"Is refering to Pres. Obama and his Communist thugs going too far?" (3 answers)

http://www.thecypresstimes.com/article/Columnists/A_Time_For_Choosing/SARAH_PALIN_DISCUSSES_THE_DANGERS_OF_OBAMAS_OUT_OF_CONTROL_SPENDING/27521

A Yahoo Buzz title read Sarah Palin blasts Pres. Obama for overspending.
Then a brief part of the article said something about Pres. Obama and his communist thugs,leading me to believe that maybe miss Palin had said it,and if so I couldn't believe it.So I clicked the link,"Read full story" and this is the link (above) and it seems to be the author and not Palin who is refering to the president and his communist thugs.
BECAUSE of the link I did not finnish the article because it made me feel as if
I was reading Nazi propaganda back in the Hitler days.Am I wrong to feel this way? I do not believe Pres. Obama is trying to eliminate this country whether I agree or not with the President's policies or his method.
Could this be racism then?(The article)
Is this really a Christian organization?(the article & author)

Or help to answer:

	"Netanyahu says Iran will not get hands on nukes, is it?"

	"Is talk of the Illuminati and a NWO just paranoid delusion?"

	"How many years can I expect that a Biden Talk Iran will continue working for?"

	"what is this Iran developing nukes Obama Iran must be kept from developing nukes: Obama?"

	"why is iran insisting on developing nukes despite obama"

Ask a question of your own:

Latest post on this question's discussion board:

(Meant to say "Detente" works - misspelled that)

"After YEARS of trying to "talk to Iran" about their nukes, is more of the same a "foolish delusion"?"

Clarifications

"Foolish Delusion/Wanton Ignorance"

"Maybe no European nation has the right to tell Iran they can not have nuclear arms. Certainly the US does not have"

"There's a very easy solution to all this..."

You may want to know:

Or help to answer:

Ask a question of your own:

Latest post on this question's discussion board: